Home - Georgetown | Visitor - Northeastern | ||||||
1st Half | 2nd Half | Total | 1st Half | 2nd Half | Total | ||
Pace | 31 | 34 | |||||
Points | 36 | 20 | 56 | 25 | 38 | 63 | |
Efficiency | 112.1 | 66.1 | 89.9 | 83.6 | 111.8 | 97.0 | |
Dunk % | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Layup% | 55.6% | 26.7% | 37.5% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
(Dunk + Layup)% | 66.7% | 31.3% | 46.4% | 42.9% | 62.5% | 53.3% | |
2-Pt Jumper% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 40.0% | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
2-Pt% | 56.3% | 33.3% | 44.1% | 42.1% | 52.2% | 47.6% | |
3-Pt Jumper% | 37.5% | 0.0% | 18.8% | 20.0% | N/A | 20.0% | |
Jumper% | 57.1% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 50.0% | 28.6% | 38.5% | |
FT% | 56.3% | 66.7% | 60.7% | 54.5% | 63.6% | 60.6% | |
Dunk Rate | 7.9% | 2.5% | 5.2% | 0.0% | 5.3% | 2.6% | |
Layup Rate | 23.7% | 38.2% | 31.0% | 37.0% | 37.2% | 37.1% | |
(Dunk + Layup) Rate | 38.7% | 46.7% | 42.9% | 45.4% | 49.0% | 47.2% | |
2-Pt Jumper Rate | 10.5% | 5.1% | 7.8% | 13.2% | 18.6% | 15.9% | |
2-Pt Rate | 49.2% | 51.8% | 50.6% | 58.6% | 67.5% | 63.1% | |
3-Pt Jumper Rate | 21.0% | 20.4% | 20.7% | 13.2% | 0.0% | 6.6% | |
Jumper Rate | 31.5% | 25.5% | 28.5% | 26.4% | 18.6% | 22.5% | |
FT | 18.9% | 13.7% | 16.3% | 13.1% | 26.3% | 19.7% | |
Effective Field Goal % | 56.3% | 23.1% | 39.0% | 39.6% | 52.2% | 45.7% | |
True Shooting % | 58.0% | 32.0% | 44.9% | 43.3% | 58.1% | 51.2% | |
Assist Rate | 58.3% | 16.7% | 44.4% | 11.1% | 25.0% | 19.0% | |
Unforced TOV Rate | 13.1% | 12.7% | 12.9% | 18.4% | 5.3% | 11.9% | |
Forced TOV Rate | 5.2% | 7.6% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 7.9% | 6.6% | |
TOV Rate | 18.3% | 20.3% | 19.3% | 23.7% | 13.2% | 18.5% | |
Block Rate | 8.3% | 0.0% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.3% | |
OR% | 46.7% | 27.3% | 35.1% | 41.2% | 35.7% | 38.7% | |
DR% | 58.8% | 64.3% | 61.3% | 53.3% | 72.7% | 64.9% |
- When a game like this happens, the best thing you can hope for is that it's a statistical aberration. The box score shows that Georgetown collapsed in several areas of the game at the same time.
- The first thing that should stick out is the decline in the eFG% and TS% in the 2nd half to the lowest levels of the year by far. Some of this was caused by bad luck and some of it due to awful shot selection.Georgetown did not make a 3 in the 2nd half and only shot 31.3% on dunks and layups (Avg 63.2% for the year)
- The turnover rate reached the high mark of the year at 19.3% for the game. Most of the errors were unforced.
- Northeastern did not shoot a 3 in the 2nd half, but did make 62.5% of their shots at the rim, while being held to 42.9% there in the first half. 47.2% of Northeastern's shots were at the rim, by far the highest allowed by Georgetown this year.
- Northeastern's turnover rate in the first half was primarily the result of unforced errors and by cutting down on the mistakes in the 2nd half, they were able to gain the extra possessions that they needed to catch-up.
- Northeastern also posted a very low assist rate of 19.0%.
- This was also Georgetown's best defensive performance for the year so far.
Home - Georgetown | Visitor - Kansas State | ||||||
1st Half | 2nd Half | Total | 1st Half | 2nd Half | Total | ||
Pace | 31 | 32 | |||||
Points | 45 | 45 | 90 | 28 | 35 | 63 | |
Efficiency | 143.6 | 141.9 | 142.5 | 89.1 | 115.6 | 102.7 | |
Dunk % | 100.0% | N/A | 100.0% | N/A | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Layup% | 88.9% | 63.6% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
(Dunk + Layup)% | 90.0% | 63.6% | 76.2% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 53.8% | |
2-Pt Jumper% | 62.5% | 60.0% | 61.1% | 28.6% | 27.3% | 28.0% | |
2-Pt% | 77.8% | 61.9% | 69.2% | 33.3% | 40.0% | 36.8% | |
3-Pt Jumper% | 33.3% | 75.0% | 46.2% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
Jumper% | 72.7% | 69.2% | 70.8% | 37.5% | 38.5% | 37.9% | |
FT% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 81.8% | 66.7% | 81.3% | 74.2% | |
Dunk Rate | 2.9% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 1.3% | |
Layup Rate | 26.3% | 32.9% | 29.6% | 9.9% | 21.0% | 15.3% | |
(Dunk + Layup) Rate | 32.0% | 34.0% | 33.0% | 12.7% | 27.2% | 20.1% | |
2-Pt Jumper Rate | 23.3% | 29.9% | 26.6% | 34.5% | 28.9% | 31.8% | |
2-Pt Rate | 55.3% | 63.9% | 59.6% | 47.1% | 56.2% | 51.9% | |
3-Pt Jumper Rate | 26.3% | 12.0% | 19.2% | 14.8% | 15.8% | 15.3% | |
Jumper Rate | 49.6% | 41.9% | 45.8% | 49.3% | 44.7% | 47.0% | |
FT Rate | 15.8% | 13.5% | 14.6% | 16.6% | 18.9% | 17.7% | |
Effective Field Goal % | 68.5% | 70.0% | 69.2% | 37.5% | 42.3% | 40.0% | |
True Shooting % | 69.7% | 76.5% | 73.0% | 45.8% | 53.0% | 49.5% | |
Assist Rate | 64.7% | 50.0% | 57.6% | 25.0% | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
Unforced TOV Rate | 2.9% | 9.0% | 5.9% | 12.3% | 7.9% | 10.1% | |
Forced TOV Rate | 2.9% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 12.3% | 5.2% | 8.9% | |
TOV Rate | 5.8% | 11.9% | 8.8% | 24.5% | 13.1% | 19.0% | |
Block Rate | 11.1% | 8.0% | 9.6% | 4.2% | 3.8% | 4.0% | |
OR% | 23.1% | 22.2% | 22.7% | 50.0% | 27.8% | 39.5% | |
DR% | 50.0% | 72.2% | 60.5% | 76.9% | 77.8% | 77.3% |
- Well, this game went better. Georgetown played a season high efficiency rate of 142.5 while holding KSU to 102.7. The final score could have been worse if not for Georgetown playing at the lowest number of possessions all year.
- Georgetown's efficiency was driven by its strong shooting throughout the floor. Georgetown shot 76.2% at the rim, 61.2% on 2-pt jumpers and 46.2% from 3, all season highs.
- The Hoyas also took better care of the ball with a season low turnover rate of 8.8%
- When Georgetown did miss, Kansas State dominated the offensive boards and allowed Georgetown to capture only 22.7% of potential offensive rebounds.
- On the defensive end, Georgetown forced Kansas State to shoot jumpers instead of getting to the rim. For Kansas State, 60% of their 2-pt shots were outside of the paint and they only converted these at a 28% rate.
Adjusted 3-pt Makes
This doesn't account for shot selection, but can help to calm down everyone's emotional swings by trying to adjust for volatility. A positive number indicates that the expected points were greater than the realized points.
Northeastern vs Georgetown: NE +2.4 / GTOWN +8.2 / NET +5.8 GTOWN
Kansas State vs Georgetown: KSU -0.9 / GTOWN -4.6 / NET + 3.7 KSU