FanPost

High Point and Colgate HD Box Scores

Home - Georgetown Visitor - High Point
1st Half 2nd Half Total 1st Half 2nd Half Total
Pace 32 38
Points 28 52 80 16 29 45
Efficiency 85.1 141.2 114.7 53.7 99.2 76.0
Dunk % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% N/A N/A N/A
Layup% 57.1% 81.3% 73.9% 27.3% 54.5% 40.9%
(Dunk + Layup)% 62.5% 82.4% 76.0% 27.3% 54.5% 40.9%
2-Pt Jumper% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 20.0% 33.3% 28.6%
2-Pt% 50.0% 75.0% 64.7% 25.0% 45.0% 36.1%
3-Pt Jumper% 40.0% 42.9% 41.7% 9.1% 20.0% 14.3%
Jumper% 37.5% 41.2% 39.4% 12.5% 26.3% 20.0%
FT% 40.0% 66.7% 54.5% 62.5% 83.3% 71.4%
Dunk Rate 2.8% 2.3% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Layup Rate 19.9% 37.5% 29.5% 27.8% 27.7% 27.8%
(Dunk + Layup) Rate 24.8% 45.2% 35.8% 34.9% 33.7% 34.3%
2-Pt Jumper Rate 17.0% 7.0% 11.6% 12.7% 22.7% 17.7%
2-Pt Rate 41.9% 52.2% 47.4% 47.6% 56.4% 52.0%
3-Pt Jumper Rate 28.4% 32.8% 30.8% 27.8% 25.2% 26.5%
Jumper Rate 45.5% 39.9% 42.4% 40.5% 47.9% 44.2%
FT Rate 6.4% 6.3% 6.4% 9.1% 6.8% 8.0%
Effective Field Goal % 54.2% 70.6% 63.8% 20.4% 40.0% 30.7%
True Shooting % 53.4% 71.0% 63.7% 26.2% 44.4% 35.6%
Assist Rate 54.5% 81.0% 71.9% 40.0% 81.8% 68.8%
Unforced TOV Rate 14.2% 11.7% 12.8% 17.7% 7.6% 12.6%
Forced TOV Rate 11.3% 2.3% 6.4% 5.1% 10.1% 7.6%
TOV Rate 25.5% 14.1% 19.2% 22.7% 17.6% 20.2%
Block Rate 8.3% 5.9% 6.9% 7.4% 6.7% 7.0%
OR% 20.0% 53.3% 36.7% 32.0% 36.8% 34.1%
DR% 68.0% 63.2% 65.9% 80.0% 46.7% 63.3%
  • Following the trend of the season, Georgetown played two very different halves of basketball. Although the offense was slow in the first half, the team's shooting (with the exception of FT's) was fairly on par. Instead, Georgetown's efficiency was brought down by a lack of quality opportunities. The high turnover rate and low offensive rebound rate led to fewer possessions and too few possessions ended in efficient opportunities (FTs and shots near the basket).
  • Georgetown's efficiency boost in the second half was a result of dominance in the paint. In the 2nd half, Georgetown shot a season best 82% on shots close to the rim and 45% of possessions ended in an attempted layup or dunk. Georgetown then reversed the poor offensive rebounding in the first half by rebounding 53% of misses in the second period.
  • On the defensive side, Georgetown played its best game of the year by holding High Point to 30.7% eFG% and a 20.2% turnover rate.
  • The FT rate for both teams was under 10% and may be a result of the refs calling a loose game.

Home - Georgetown Visitor - Colgate
1st Half 2nd Half Total 1st Half 2nd Half Total
Pace 29 35
Points 21 40 61 15 40 55
Efficiency 71.9 118.0 95.9 59.7 127.4 96.2
Dunk % 50.0% N/A 50.0% N/A N/A N/A
Layup% 60.0% 77.8% 68.4% 0.0% 80.0% 57.1%
(Dunk + Layup)% 58.3% 77.8% 66.7% 0.0% 80.0% 57.1%
2-Pt Jumper% 20.0% 40.0% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%
2-Pt% 40.9% 57.9% 48.8% 16.7% 64.3% 42.3%
3-Pt Jumper% 0.0% 16.7% 6.7% 23.1% 20.0% 20.8%
Jumper% 10.5% 31.3% 20.0% 23.8% 21.4% 22.2%
FT% 60.0% 75.0% 72.0% 50.0% 84.2% 78.3%
Dunk Rate 5.1% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Layup Rate 25.5% 23.2% 24.4% 12.2% 28.3% 20.3%
(Dunk + Layup) Rate 41.1% 25.9% 32.8% 13.9% 30.9% 22.5%
2-Pt Jumper Rate 25.5% 25.8% 25.6% 24.4% 11.3% 17.4%
2-Pt Rate 66.6% 51.6% 58.5% 38.3% 42.2% 39.9%
3-Pt Jumper Rate 23.0% 15.5% 19.2% 39.7% 28.3% 34.7%
Jumper Rate 48.5% 41.2% 44.9% 64.1% 39.6% 52.1%
FT Rate 5.7% 23.2% 14.4% 5.5% 24.2% 15.0%
Effective Field Goal % 29.0% 50.0% 38.4% 26.0% 50.0% 37.0%
True Shooting % 31.6% 59.2% 45.5% 28.0% 61.8% 45.7%
Assist Rate 33.3% 58.3% 47.6% 40.0% 54.5% 50.0%
Unforced TOV Rate 5.1% 7.7% 6.4% 9.1% 2.8% 5.8%
Forced TOV Rate 10.2% 5.1% 7.7% 9.1% 5.6% 7.2%
TOV Rate 15.3% 12.8% 14.1% 18.3% 8.4% 13.0%
Block Rate 9.7% 4.0% 7.1% 0.0% 8.3% 4.0%
OR% 43.5% 33.3% 39.5% 33.3% 20.0% 27.0%
DR% 66.7% 80.0% 73.0% 56.5% 66.7% 60.5%
  • The Colgate game looks very similar to the High Point game, except in the 2nd half Georgetown's offense and defense did not perform nearly as well.
  • Georgetown's poor first half was the result of poor outside shooting with the team converting only 10.5% of all jump shots. While bad shooting nights can happen, what worries me more is the focus of the backcourt on jump shots. The poor jump shooting combined with the low assist rate (33% and low FT rate (5.7%) suggests a stagnant offense that isn't creating enough high quality opportunities.
  • In the 2nd half, Georgetown improved its shooting close to the basket and the perimeter shooting was slightly better, but unfortunately the defense allowed Colgate to shoot at a similar efficiency level in the 2nd half (eFG% 50.0% Gtown to 50.0% Colgate / TS% Gtown 59.2% to 61.8% Colgate), including allowing Colgate to shoot 80% close to the rim.
  • Georgetown did do a great job creating possessions through winning the glass on both ends and turning the ball over at an average rate.

Adjusted 3-pt Makes

This doesn't account for shot selection, but can help to calm down everyone's emotional swings by trying to adjust for volatility. A positive number indicates that the expected points were greater than the realized points. For players w/ 25+ attempts, shooting percentages are from this season and if not shooting percentages for each player are from the 2012-2013 season when available. Otherwise, the team's 3-pt percentage for the 2013-2014 season is used in the calculation for each player.

HP +10.2 / GTOWN -3.7 / HP +13.9

COLG +16.7 / GTOWN +11.8 / COLG +4.9

Georgetown missed a lot of 3's, but so did Colgate and that makes the result more discouraging because the difference in expected 3's and the HD boxscore suggests that this game wasn't just close due to "bad luck" from a Georgetown fan's perspective.

Stay Casual, my friends.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Casual Hoya

You must be a member of Casual Hoya to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Casual Hoya. You should read them.

Join Casual Hoya

You must be a member of Casual Hoya to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Casual Hoya. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker